[Koha-bugs] [Bug 18639] Separate replacement cost and retail price fields in acquisitions

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
Tue May 23 09:20:37 CEST 2017


https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18639

Laurence Rault <laurence.rault at biblibre.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |laurence.rault at biblibre.com

--- Comment #1 from Laurence Rault <laurence.rault at biblibre.com> ---
The trouble is that now the budgeted cost (ecost) is calculated based on
Replacement cost (rrp) and not (not only in fact) from vendor price (listprice)
anymore. And I think it may be bug : 

When you change rrp in an order, budgeted cost does not change in the form, but
after validation, values in the table for budgeted cost are re-calculated
against the modified rrp.


Maybe we should consider alternatives : 

1) make the budgeted cost only calculated from vendor price ; if rrp is
modified, no effect on ecost (as it is still the case in Koha 3.22). And then
make the rrp editable through the whole workflow. Would it be enough ?

2) I agree with your proposition, with some questions : 
- what would be the difference between Vendor price and Retail price ?
- I am not at all familiar with EDI, but is the replacementprice sent or
received to/by the vendor ? I think vendor price and/or actual cost should be
(maybe the are already).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


More information about the Koha-bugs mailing list