[Koha-bugs] [Bug 25483] Url item field no longer accepts html tag

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25483

David Cook <dcook at prosentient.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dcook at prosentient.com.au

--- Comment #14 from David Cook <dcook at prosentient.com.au> ---
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #13)
> I think we go way beyond 852 in a lot of areas - which is also the problem:
> There are no more free subfields in Koha to use for this. And if you have
> repated $u you also get the issue of sequence. Btw - if we used MFHD (MARC
> for Holdings Data, we could have a full 856 there, so it's not really a
> limitation of the standard).
> 
> The item editor is not made to resort the item subfields and I also feel
> like that would not be a good solution and more error prone / harder to
> handle for catalogers.

Of course, I think the only reason we use the 952 for item/holdings data is
because we forced Zebra (and to a lesser degree Elasticsearch) to use MARC.

Neither Zebra nor Elasticsearch actually require MARCXML, so another way
forward is to have Koha Item Metadata that we create and use however we want.
(We'd just need a MARC export for it for metadata exchange with other systems,
and in that case we could leave off things like link text.)

A complicated avenue for sure, but it's an option.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.