[Koha-bugs] [Bug 32030] Electronic resource management (ERM)

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32030

--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Field <jonathan.field at ptfs-europe.com> ---
(In reply to Victor Grousset/tuxayo from comment #13)
> In the /agreements page, the «Filter by expired: [X] on» is confusing. It's
> not clear that it must be ticked for the date field to have any effect. Or
> maybe unchecked has a different effect. But it seems not.
> 
> https://wtf.roflcopter.fr/pics/foywDHSU/5E4BFfT6.png
> 
> The doc draft says
> > At the top of the Agreements page you will notice a Filter box. The purpose of this is to allow you to quickly filter expired agreements or agreements which may have an upcoming renewal (and therefore might require action).

I agree with Jonathan, it works as it was intended as far as I'm concerned. The
idea was to have something like the Print Serials page
(cgi-bin/koha/serials/checkexpiration.pl) where you can look up upcoming
subscriptions (electronic in this case). This filter has benefits as it's more
versatile, you can look up expired subscriptions for example.    
> 
> There doesn't seem to be another filter mode when unchecked.
> 
> From the code it seems the date field is only used when the box is ticked.
> Is that done to be able to keep an expiration date saved without having it
> used? (it's not saved so it's not that)
> Otherwise the filter could just be used when the date field is populated.

Not sure what you mean here but the table filters really provide all the other
filtering you might need I would say. For example, Status: cancelled etc.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.