[Koha-bugs] [Bug 34032] Holds expirationdate left blank if waiting status is reverted
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
Fri Sep 8 12:05:41 CEST 2023
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34032
Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy at rijksmuseum.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|Signed Off |Failed QA
--- Comment #4 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy at rijksmuseum.nl> ---
Did not finish this one completely now, but feel somehow that it needs more
attention still (qa intuition). Hmm.
Reserves still contains:
expirationdate => $hold->patron_expiration_date,
Are we not respecting that one?
my %updated_columns = $self->_result->get_dirty_columns;
return $self->SUPER::store unless %updated_columns;
This may be obvious. But should we add $hold_reverted here? Or just trust that
we have dirty columns coming from RevertWaitingStatus?
+ ( C4::Context->preference('DefaultHoldExpirationdate')
+ && ! exists $updated_columns{expirationdate} )
+ || ( C4::Context->preference('DefaultHoldExpirationdate')
+ && exists $updated_columns{expirationdate}
+ && $hold_reverted )
Still breaking my head here.
Could you please clarify in meantime a bit? Thx
Status change for feedback.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
More information about the Koha-bugs
mailing list