<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000">
<DIV>Greetings,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; COLOR: #000000; FONT-STYLE: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none; DISPLAY: inline">
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV>
<DIV>> I belive install docs should be qa-ed for every release and
cleaned.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>+1 – Yes, if the install instructions were QA-ed each release, the “origin”
vs. “origin/3.10.x” would not be a concern of mine.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>> Regarding OpenSuSE i know a few that run Koha flawlessly on it. At
leat 3.6 i think.</DIV>
<DIV>> The main problem is there are not many volunteers to take on the job
of testing and rewriting.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Therein is the hassle for those of us who do not have a love of
documenting.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>> I've never used dpkg on a rpm-based distro, did the reverse
thou.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I’m trying to stick with the installation paradigm of the distro I am
playing with.</DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>GPML,</DIV>
<DIV>Mark Tompsett</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>