[Bug 37788] New: in UNIMARC 099$t and 995$h sould not both be indexed in ccode
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37788 Bug ID: 37788 Summary: in UNIMARC 099$t and 995$h sould not both be indexed in ccode Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mathsabypro@gmail.com QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org 099$t and 995$h are both indexed in ccode. I believe this is not good, as those two fields can contain different values. Is it possible to create a distinct index for 099$t ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37788 --- Comment #1 from Mathieu Saby <mathsabypro@gmail.com> --- In standard configuration, 099$t is linked to "TYPEDOC" authorized values. So why not creating a typedoc index? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37788 Phil Ringnalda <phil@chetcolibrary.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |phil@chetcolibrary.org --- Comment #2 from Phil Ringnalda <phil@chetcolibrary.org> --- 099$t isn't trying to be a ccode, it's trying to be a biblio-level itemtype without being an itemtype, as you discovered in bug 38336 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 38336 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org