https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33153 Michael Adamyk <madamyk@ckls.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |madamyk@ckls.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33153 --- Comment #2 from Mathieu Saby <mathsabypro@gmail.com> --- I think we sholuld - add a deleted_itemnumber column in accountlines table, and copy the itemnumber in that column when the item is deleted - edit templates to search item in that column in addition to the itemnumber column -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33153 Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.koha-community | |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi | |?id=30648 CC| |andrew@bywatersolutions.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33153 Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also|https://bugs.koha-community |https://bugs.koha-community |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi |?id=25260 |?id=20271 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com> --- On Bug 30648 we resolved a similar issue with lost of bibliographic detail in Holds History by adding a deleted_biblionumber to the reserves table. Bug 20271 offers a different approach, merging items and deleted_items. It's In Discussion, as that's a large change and not without issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33153 Steve, OSLRI, USA <sspohn@oslri.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sspohn@oslri.net --- Comment #6 from Steve, OSLRI, USA <sspohn@oslri.net> --- I would very much like to see the itemnumber itself retained. The biblionumber alone does not help me attribute the fines based on owning library rules in a consortial environment. I need to be able to crosswalk from the itemnumber to the homebranch. A separate deleteditemnumber field would be a dandy solution. I just assumed the itemnumber would not be rmmoved and had already built my query to check the deleteditems table if it wasn't present in the items table, and only learn this year when running stats that this wasn't the case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33153 Brendan Lawlor <blawlor@clamsnet.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |blawlor@clamsnet.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.