[Bug 5632] New: SIP improvements = Date formatting & debarrement management
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 Summary: SIP improvements = Date formatting & debarrement management Change sponsored?: Sponsored Product: Koha Version: rel_3_4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: PATCH-Sent Component: SIP2 AssignedTo: paul.poulain@biblibre.com ReportedBy: paul.poulain@biblibre.com QAContact: koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 * the dates should be printed in human-readable format, not in timestamp * The patron debarment can now have a date (new feature of BibLibre circ improvements). We have to deal with this date on the SIP messages -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 --- Comment #1 from Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com> 2011-03-28 12:34:18 UTC --- Created attachment 3464 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=3464 Clean patch Patch was already sent to the mailing list but some merge problems remained. So, this is a clean patch that format dates to be readable by human beings. Also sent to mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 --- Comment #2 from Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> 2011-03-30 21:43:11 UTC --- Created attachment 3554 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=3554 Another patch -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris@bigballofwax.co.nz Blocks| |5992 Patch Status|--- |Needs Signoff -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 Colin Campbell <colin.campbell@ptfs-europe.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |colin.campbell@ptfs-europe. | |com --- Comment #3 from Colin Campbell <colin.campbell@ptfs-europe.com> 2011-07-07 09:38:48 UTC --- The date patch reformats some dates in the item information response which have their formats specified in the sip standard. Also while due date does not have a specified format some units assume all dates will be formatted the same (i.e. the sip format), I once did the same change for the same purpose only to find a sites self check machines stop functionning. On 3M machines date formatting can be configured on the self check unit itself. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de --- Comment #4 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> 2011-08-29 15:33:29 UTC --- Reading Colin's comment it sounds like Failed QA? Do we need a different solution for the problem? And does this patch rely on the 'fines in days' feature? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alex.arnaud@biblibre.com --- Comment #5 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> 2011-08-29 15:37:58 UTC --- *** Bug 6042 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patch Status|Needs Signoff |Failed QA AssignedTo|paul.poulain@biblibre.com |alex.arnaud@biblibre.com --- Comment #6 from Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com> 2011-09-27 15:54:30 UTC --- Alex, Assigning this bug to you, as you've written the 6042 patch. Please read comments from both patchs, investigate & argue. In the meantime, marking this patch "failed QA" as the 6042 one (hint : maybe there's a difference between french 3M self-checkouts & english ones...) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 jdemuth@roseville.ca.us <jdemuth@roseville.ca.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jdemuth@roseville.ca.us -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 Olli-Antti Kivilahti <olli-antti.kivilahti@jns.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |olli-antti.kivilahti@jns.fi --- Comment #7 from Olli-Antti Kivilahti <olli-antti.kivilahti@jns.fi> --- Hi there! I went through the whole SIP2.0 manual from 3M and I got 15 instances of date-use using the SIP::timestamp and 3 usages with no definition (optional) of the timeformat (see down). All undefined usages are using the AH-field. <SNIP> 2.00 Item Information Response due date AH variable-length optional field. 2.00 Renew Response due date AH variable-length required field Checkout Response due date AH variable-length required field 2.00 Hold Response 2.00 expiration date BW 18-char, fixed-length optional field: YYYYMMDDZZZZHHMMSS </SNAP> I think one can strongly infer from the documentation that using the established timeformat (the SIP-format) is supposed to be used. The SIP-device vendor anyway should format the date to be displayed per configuration. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 --- Comment #8 from Colin Campbell <colin.campbell@ptfs-europe.com> --- (In reply to Olli-Antti Kivilahti from comment #7)
I think one can strongly infer from the documentation that using the established timeformat (the SIP-format) is supposed to be used. The SIP-device vendor anyway should format the date to be displayed per configuration.
Took a look at 3M's SIP 3.0 document and it specifies all these to use sip formatted dates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 --- Comment #9 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Reading the last 2 comments it looks like we should not change the date formatting (assuming we are using sip formatted dates right now). Should we close this bug? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org