[Bug 17967] New: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Bug ID: 17967 Summary: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |Needs Signoff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> --- Created attachment 59451 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=59451&action=edit Bug 17967: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Nothing new here, unless we are introducing a regression. The items.fine is a trick of our historical syntax. We need to provide a way to access this value from the a notice template using the TT syntax. A bug 17976 has been opened for discussion. Test plan: Define ODUE and OVERDUES_SLIP notice templates and use it to generate overdue notices from the cronjob script (misc/cronjobs/overdue_notices.pl) or the interface (members/print_overdues.pl). You should be able to generate the same notices with and without using the TT syntax -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |17966 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17966 [Bug 17966] TT syntax for notices - Prove that ISSUESLIP is compatible -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.koha-community | |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi | |?id=17976 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |17961 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17961 [Bug 17961] TT syntax for notices - Prove we have an equivalent for our historical custom syntax -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |veron@veron.ch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |17969 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17969 [Bug 17969] Refactor the way <<items.content>> is generated -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #59451|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> --- Created attachment 61628 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=61628&action=edit Bug 17967: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Nothing new here, unless we are introducing a regression. The items.fine is a trick of our historical syntax. We need to provide a way to access this value from the a notice template using the TT syntax. A bug 17976 has been opened for discussion. Test plan: Define ODUE and OVERDUES_SLIP notice templates and use it to generate overdue notices from the cronjob script (misc/cronjobs/overdue_notices.pl) or the interface (members/print_overdues.pl). You should be able to generate the same notices with and without using the TT syntax -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #61628|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> --- Created attachment 63977 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=63977&action=edit Bug 17967: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Nothing new here, unless we are introducing a regression. The items.fine is a trick of our historical syntax. We need to provide a way to access this value from the a notice template using the TT syntax. A bug 17976 has been opened for discussion. Test plan: Define ODUE and OVERDUES_SLIP notice templates and use it to generate overdue notices from the cronjob script (misc/cronjobs/overdue_notices.pl) or the interface (members/print_overdues.pl). You should be able to generate the same notices with and without using the TT syntax -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Signoff |Signed Off -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #63977|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #4 from Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> --- Created attachment 65686 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=65686&action=edit Bug 17967: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Nothing new here, unless we are introducing a regression. The items.fine is a trick of our historical syntax. We need to provide a way to access this value from the a notice template using the TT syntax. A bug 17976 has been opened for discussion. Test plan: Define ODUE and OVERDUES_SLIP notice templates and use it to generate overdue notices from the cronjob script (misc/cronjobs/overdue_notices.pl) or the interface (members/print_overdues.pl). You should be able to generate the same notices with and without using the TT syntax Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Passed QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #65686|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #5 from Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> --- Created attachment 66774 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=66774&action=edit Bug 17967: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Nothing new here, unless we are introducing a regression. The items.fine is a trick of our historical syntax. We need to provide a way to access this value from the a notice template using the TT syntax. A bug 17976 has been opened for discussion. Test plan: Define ODUE and OVERDUES_SLIP notice templates and use it to generate overdue notices from the cronjob script (misc/cronjobs/overdue_notices.pl) or the interface (members/print_overdues.pl). You should be able to generate the same notices with and without using the TT syntax Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Passed QA |Pushed to Master --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> --- Pushed to master for 17.11, thanks to everybody involved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Bug 17967 depends on bug 17966, which changed state. Bug 17966 Summary: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ISSUESLIP is compatible https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17966 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Pushed to Master |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Bug 17967 depends on bug 17969, which changed state. Bug 17969 Summary: Refactor the way <<items.content>> is generated https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17969 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Pushed to Master |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Fridolin SOMERS <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Pushed to Master |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED CC| |fridolin.somers@biblibre.co | |m --- Comment #7 from Fridolin SOMERS <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com> --- Enhancement not pushed to 17.05.x -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.koha-community | |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi | |?id=36109 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon@bugs.koha-community.org