https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11299 --- Comment #73 from Blou <philippe.blouin@inlibro.com> --- 1) Did you read my explanation on the matter of answering? The user/owner has many other priorities, and the delay should not be a consideration. Who's waiting on who here? 2) In all those exchanges, I do not see the issue of Tests being raised until you did. Not that it's not valid, mind you, but the testers are working on the Functionalities/usage (Kathleen) or questioning the validity (Marcel). I prefer that, personally. No point in working and rebasing and working again on tests for a feature that might not get accepted as deemed useless. Tests are easy, Bouzid/team has written plenty of those for all the other patches. I have no personal attachment to the feature. Didn't code it, do not maintain it. And knowing what code it touches, it matters to me that it's done well. The process is important and must be followed. But the feature, per the actual cataloging users, is a must have for a serious tool. Must. Have. Philippe PS You get a piece of meat, you smell it, your experience/intuition tells you it's shit, you won't eat it. No need to call a biolab to test the meat. QAs have seen enough features and pieces of code to do that with patches. I do that with all _new_ features or bugs we talk about submitting. Let me tell you I have a picky nose myself, and I'm good at math/finance. The paying users appreciate. A smell test is not an insult. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.