https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39990 Lisette Scheer <lisette@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |20747 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20747 [Bug 20747] Allow LocalHoldsPriority to fill by hierarchical groups system rather than individual library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39990 trevor.diamond@mainlib.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trevor.diamond@mainlib.org --- Comment #1 from trevor.diamond@mainlib.org --- My cooperative of 42 libraries would also appreciate the ability to nest hold groups, similar to the initial example. Rather than think of it in terms of group and subgroup (which implies just two levels), I would prefer a way where we can "order" the groups in terms of nesting. Or would it make more sense to rank the various groups to which a library belongs in terms of ascending size. So the smallest group gets the first considerations, and continuing up in size until the request is filled or every library in the system is eligible. If the ranking is automatically applied through this kind of logic, there's a lower hurdle to using the feature, but if there are two groups of a similar size, it would be random which is considered "first". You could have more control of the order if there was additional group feature of "priority" like we see for item groups, which lets you control the order they appear. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.