[Bug 26653] New: Allow editing of item notes on moredetail.pl with circulation permission
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26653 Bug ID: 26653 Summary: Allow editing of item notes on moredetail.pl with circulation permission Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew@bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl If a user has circulation permissions, they can edit the lost/damaged/withdrawn statuses of an item on moredetail.pl (the items tab in the catalog). However, they cannot edit the public and non-public notes for that item. Those notes are only editable on this if one also has edit_items permission, which opens up a lot more actions. I feel the editing of these notes from moredetail should also fall under circulation permissions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26653 Jeff Gaines <jgaine@arlingtonva.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jgaine@arlingtonva.us --- Comment #1 from Jeff Gaines <jgaine@arlingtonva.us> --- This would be very useful to us, as circ staff may need to add notes to items where a problem cannot be addressed at the time. For example, if a piece of a multi-part set is missing, but the patron still wants to check the item out. With a note on the item, when the item is returned staff will know that it was missing when the current patron checked it out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
From my perspective, the problem is... how do we manage the permissions for
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26653 David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcook@prosentient.com.au --- Comment #2 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- I've never paid much attention to moredetail.pl and updateitem.pl, but now that I am... I am not loving what I'm seeing. these things? Managing Lost/Damaged/Withdrawn status... that probably makes sense for circulation, especially since they're fixed fields. But notes fields... there are more restricted/security-conscious environments where that's a big problem. (It's even a problem with the status quo because they bypass SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing which is not great.) Actually even in a normal environment... you'd probably want to be able to see who added the note. By editing the public/non-public notes... it seems like a workaround to a real problem that isn't being addressed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26653 Lucy Vaux-Harvey <lucy.vaux-harvey@openfifth.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lucy.vaux-harvey@openfifth. | |co.uk --- Comment #3 from Lucy Vaux-Harvey <lucy.vaux-harvey@openfifth.co.uk> --- It would be a good enhancement to see the functionality in SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing extended to include the notes display on moredetail.pl. It currently only takes effect from the cataloguing screens. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org