[Bug 16327] New: Running build_oai_sets.pl with embed items option should consider every item in a biblio
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16327 Bug ID: 16327 Summary: Running build_oai_sets.pl with embed items option should consider every item in a biblio Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pjamorim91@gmail.com QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org After configuring a mapping for an oai set which uses item fields, the build_oai_sets.pl must be run with the -i flag, to embed item data in a biblio. The bug is that it's only considering the first item (by itemnumber) of the biblio, not all the items in it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16327 Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|3.22 |master CC| |mirko@abunchofthings.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16327 --- Comment #1 from Pedro Amorim <pjamorim91@gmail.com> --- The solution is shared in the following community entry: https://lists.katipo.co.nz/public/koha/2016-April/045257.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16327 Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe | |.com --- Comment #2 from Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com> --- Did you fancy submitting that as a patch.. is this still valid in master now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16327 David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcook@prosentient.com.au --- Comment #3 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- Yikes... this isn't good... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16327 --- Comment #4 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- The code has changed since this was posted. I'm doing some testing of OAI sets, so I might try to see if I can reproduce this one, but I think it's probably invalid at this point. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16327 Pedro Amorim <pedro.amorim@ptfs-europe.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pedro.amorim@ptfs-europe.co | |m -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16327 --- Comment #5 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #4)
The code has changed since this was posted. I'm doing some testing of OAI sets, so I might try to see if I can reproduce this one, but I think it's probably invalid at this point.
any news? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16327 --- Comment #6 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #5)
(In reply to David Cook from comment #4)
The code has changed since this was posted. I'm doing some testing of OAI sets, so I might try to see if I can reproduce this one, but I think it's probably invalid at this point.
any news?
I can't remember if I looked into this or not... In practice, I don't think I ever end up using items when building OAI sets, because it hasn't been logical for the libraries. Or rather the logic they want to use with items is too complex to work with our current mappings... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org