[Bug 41275] New: VueJS: We should abandon type="vendor" resource attribute
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41275 Bug ID: 41275 Summary: VueJS: We should abandon type="vendor" resource attribute Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pedro.amorim@openfifth.co.uk QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org It should be utilizing the relationshipSelect instead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41275 Pedro Amorim <pedro.amorim@openfifth.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan.druart@gmail.com, | |martin.renvoize@openfifth.c | |o.uk, | |matt.blenkinsop@openfifth.c | |o.uk, | |pedro.amorim@openfifth.co.u | |k -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41275 --- Comment #1 from Pedro Amorim <pedro.amorim@openfifth.co.uk> --- Created attachment 189717 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=189717&action=edit Bug 41275: Drop vendor in favor of relationshipSelect This is only a PoC for AgreementResource. More are needed. Type = 'vendor' was a measure taken at the time to solve the issue immediatelly, but we have since abstracted 'simple' relationships to use relationshipSelect and there's no reason to continue using type: 'vendor'. The thing I'd like comments on here is that an API call is done by relationshipSelect, whereas before the vendors were coming from the vendorStore loaded in ERM. AFAIK, this vendorStore load in ERM is still required to populate the 'vendor' table column filter options. Thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41275 --- Comment #2 from Matt Blenkinsop <matt.blenkinsop@openfifth.co.uk> --- Could the table column not just be a searchable column rather than needing all vendors loading into a dropdown? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41275 Pedro Amorim <pedro.amorim@openfifth.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |In Discussion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41275 Michaela Sieber <michaela.sieber@kit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |clemens.tubach@kit.edu, | |katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de, | |michaela.sieber@kit.edu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org