https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11043 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Discussion here boiled down to the fact, that UNIMARC users have not mapped biblioitems.itemtype to the itemtypes authorised value. I believe this needs a different fix than suggested and is much more complex. We rely on items.itype and bilbioitems.itemtype to be the same list of itemtypes in more and more spots. Some I know of: - Suggesting the itemtype for the item when cataloguing - Search: In MARC21 both are indexed as itemtype, allowing to easily search for records without items too (only MARC21?) - Article requests on records without items - Hold limit checking If UNIMARC uses the field differently, there is a bigger discussion to be had on how to handle this to give both MARC formats the same behaviour in circ etc. I believe if necessary document type should be a separate thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.