[Bug 1993] Task Scheduler Needs Re-write
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=1993 --- Comment #58 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- As Martin has noted elsewhere: (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #6)
I've long felt our use of 'at' in scheduler was wrong, but we've not had a reasonable alternative. We now have BackgroundJobs and I could see us using that system as an alternative to using 'at' and calling a script.
I agree about using BackgroundJobs for the execution. We'll still need a scheduler, and I think the shortest path forward is a cronjob-based scheduler script, which polls the database every X interval looking for jobs to run. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon@bugs.koha-community.org