[Bug 37772] New: Holdings_data_fields_(9xx)
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37772 Bug ID: 37772 Summary: Holdings_data_fields_(9xx) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 24.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Documentation Assignee: koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org Reporter: joseanjos@gmail.com QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org CC: aude.charillon@ptfs-europe.com, philip.orr@lmscloud.de The fields 995$a, 995$8 and 995$d are different on the Manual and Wiki https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Holdings_data_fields_(9xx) https://koha-community.org/manual/latest/en/html/cataloging.html#bibliograph... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37772 Aude Charillon <aude.charillon@ptfs-europe.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Documentation| |Aude Charillon contact| | Status|NEW |Needs documenting --- Comment #1 from Aude Charillon <aude.charillon@ptfs-europe.com> --- Thank you for pointing this out. If you were looking for information regarding those fields, I would advise to trust the Manual. This section of the Manual was last updated 2 years ago, whereas the one in the Wiki page was updated in 2015. The Wiki page does also say: "Until now only a proposal (not in the code)" and references Koha version 3.2, which is positively ancient in Koha terms. I will check with some UNIMARC users that the Manual section is correct. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37772 Aude Charillon <aude.charillon@ptfs-europe.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Documentation|Aude Charillon | contact| | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37772 Aude Charillon <aude.charillon@ptfs-europe.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|Needs documenting |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Aude Charillon <aude.charillon@ptfs-europe.com> --- We just had a discussion on the Koha community Mattermost (big thanks to Mathieu Saby) which confirms the following: - the Wiki page is out of date. - the Manual is correct. It looks like it was updated following bug 30373. These field values are used in any new Koha installations at version 22.05 and later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37772 Alexander Wagner <alexander.wagner@desy.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexander.wagner@desy.de --- Comment #3 from Alexander Wagner <alexander.wagner@desy.de> --- (In reply to Aude Charillon from comment #2)
- the Wiki page is out of date. - the Manual is correct. It looks like it was updated following bug 30373. These field values are used in any new Koha installations at version 22.05 and later.
Is there a canonical way to mark it in the wiki as outdated and refer to the manual section? (Just as I based our migration procedures mainly on the wiki as I obviously didn't notice the chapter in the manual.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37772 --- Comment #4 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Alexander Wagner from comment #3)
(In reply to Aude Charillon from comment #2)
- the Wiki page is out of date. - the Manual is correct. It looks like it was updated following bug 30373. These field values are used in any new Koha installations at version 22.05 and later.
Is there a canonical way to mark it in the wiki as outdated and refer to the manual section?
(Just as I based our migration procedures mainly on the wiki as I obviously didn't notice the chapter in the manual.)
We should definitely do that. Something like this with a link to the manual maybe? https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Discharge_RFC -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37772 --- Comment #5 from Aude Charillon <aude.charillon@ptfs-europe.com> --- Thanks, that's a nice example. I've added that https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Holdings_data_fields_(9xx) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37772 --- Comment #6 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Aude Charillon from comment #5)
Thanks, that's a nice example. I've added that https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Holdings_data_fields_(9xx)
Awesome, thanks Aude! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon@bugs.koha-community.org