https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30383 --- Comment #2 from Marjorie Barry-Vila <marjorie.barry-vila@collecto.ca> --- (In reply to Owen Leonard from comment #1)

I don't see this problem in my test system. What version of Koha are you using?

Hi, I tested on 20.05.03. Looks like it mostly concerns the Accepted tab https://www.screencast.com/t/smvcBvOlvnc Marjorie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30383 --- Comment #4 from Marjorie Barry-Vila <marjorie.barry-vila@collecto.ca> --- (In reply to Owen Leonard from comment #3)

Can't see the problem in 20.05.03. My next idea is to make sure we're trying it in the same browser.

The other possibility is that one of your suggestions which only appears onscreen when you switch to 100 results has a very long string of unbroken text. That would force the table cell to expand to accommodate it.

I tested on firefox and chrome and I had the same problem. But indeed a too long url in a note caused the enlargement of the column. I reduced the url and the display is correct now. I guess it's not necessarily a bug? Thank you for your time Marjorie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

tr >td:nth-child(10){ min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; }

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30383 Ray Delahunty <r.delahunty@arts.ac.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |r.delahunty@arts.ac.uk --- Comment #6 from Ray Delahunty <r.delahunty@arts.ac.uk> --- Created attachment 159150 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=159150&action=edit CSS used to lock down 2 columns. We wanted two columns to be set to fixed width and our support company added some CSS to the IntranetUsercss feature we don't have access to (we see a link to it residing on the server). No promises it would work elsewhere without a tweak, but it looks good for us. table#table_1.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(2){ width:250px; } table#table_1.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr > th:nth-child(10){ min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_1.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr > td:nth-child(2){ width: 250px; } table#table_1.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr > td:nth-child(10){ min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_2.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(2) { width: 250px; } table#table_2.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(10){ min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_2.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(2){ width: 250px; } table#table_2.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody table#table_3.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(2) { width: 250px; } table#table_3.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(10) { min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_3.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(2){ width: 250px; } table#table_3.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(10){ min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_4.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(2) { width: 250px; } table#table_4.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(10) { min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_4.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(2){ width: 250px; } table#table_4.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(10){ min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_5.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(2) { width: 250px; } table#table_5.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(10) { min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_5.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(2){ width: 250px; } table#table_5.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(10){ min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_6.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(2) { width: 250px; } table#table_6.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(10) { min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_6.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(2){ width: 250px; } table#table_6.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(10){ min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_7.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(2) { width: 250px; } table#table_7.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(10) { min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_7.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(2){ width: 250px; } table#table_7.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(10){ min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_8.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(2) { width: 250px; } table#table_8.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > thead >tr >th:nth-child(10) { min-width: 180px; max-width: 180px; } table#table_8.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(2){ width: 250px; } table#table_8.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(10){ min-width:180px; max-width: 180px; } table.sorted.dataTable.no-footer > tbody >tr >td:nth-child(2)

div.suggestion_note{ width: 250px; height: fit-content; overflow-wrap: break-word; word-wrap: break-word; -ms-word-break: break-all; word-break: break-word; }

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30383 Koha collecto <koha@collecto.ca> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |koha@collecto.ca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.