[Bug 12019] New: funds displayed on acquisition home show funds of all branches
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Bug ID: 12019 Summary: funds displayed on acquisition home show funds of all branches Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.12 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org Reporter: marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org Created attachment 26710 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=26710&action=edit funds Hi, In 3.12, funds displayed on acquisition home show funds of all branches. In 3.8, funds of librarian's branch were displayed. Is this an enhancement? I forgot a sys pref? See the capture. Regards, Marjorie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de --- Comment #1 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Hi Marjorie, some ideas: - do you have superlibrarian permission? - are your funds 'limited to' the library? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #2 from Marjorie Barry-Vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca> --- Thanks Katrin. Yes, i have superlibrarian permissions and funds are limited to each branch. May i test something else? Marjorie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #3 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Maybe try removing your superlibrairan flag for a test? And keep all other permissions? I think that could be the difference, that a superlibriarian can always see the funds now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #4 from Marjorie Barry-Vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #3)
Maybe try removing your superlibrairan flag for a test? And keep all other permissions? I think that could be the difference, that a superlibriarian can always see the funds now.
I tested several flags but nothing change on acquisition home. Have you tested it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |major --- Comment #5 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Hi Marjorie, I did test now - and I think you are right. Something about the visibility is broken. I removed the permission to manage all funds, I am not a superlibrarian, the fund access is restricted to another branch and I can still see it :( I am quite sure this used to work differently and it quite a problem. The view is also the same on the acquisition start page and the fund list for the budget. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|3.12 |master -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #6 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Hm, I tried a git bisect, because I wondered when it changed and the change seems to have been introduced by: 203757e353cbbb2add934523fdbd7113c6180207 is the first bad commit commit 203757e353cbbb2add934523fdbd7113c6180207 Author: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com> Date: Fri May 18 09:12:43 2012 +0200 Bug 7304: More permissions for budgets -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #7 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Note: IndependentBranches also doesn't make any difference. I have upgraded the severity, as this is quite a problem for bigger libraries that don't want other branches to see their funds. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan.druart@biblibre.co | |m --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> --- Marjorie, Try to define an owner for the fund. If no owner is defined, it seems there is no restriction. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |Needs Signoff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> --- Created attachment 26757 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=26757&action=edit Bug 12019: FIX budget_owner_id node is duplicated The input witht the budget_owner_id id is duplicated. It breaks the jQuery selector $('#budget_owner_id').val(''); -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> --- Created attachment 26758 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=26758&action=edit Bug 12019: If a fund has a restriction, a owner is mandatory The C4::Budgets::CanUserUseBudget assumes that budget_owner_id is set if a restriction (budget_permission) exists. see && $budget->{budget_owner_id} && $budget->{budget_owner_id} != $borrower->{borrowernumber} Test plan: Edit a fund and try to save it with a limitation and no owner. It should not be possible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #11 from Marjorie Barry-Vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #8)
Marjorie, Try to define an owner for the fund. If no owner is defined, it seems there is no restriction.
Jonathan, I defined an owner for the fund but for me it is the same on acquisition home page, i can see funds of the other branches and of the other owners. I should see only the budgets that I am an owner, right? We need to change something in the drop down menu restrictions? Thanks! Marjorie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to Marjorie Barry-Vila from comment #11)
I defined an owner for the fund but for me it is the same on acquisition home page, i can see funds of the other branches and of the other owners. I should see only the budgets that I am an owner, right? We need to change something in the drop down menu restrictions?
Could you confirm the issue still appears with these patches? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #13 from Marjorie Barry-Vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #12)
(In reply to Marjorie Barry-Vila from comment #11)
I defined an owner for the fund but for me it is the same on acquisition home page, i can see funds of the other branches and of the other owners. I should see only the budgets that I am an owner, right? We need to change something in the drop down menu restrictions?
Could you confirm the issue still appears with these patches?
Hi Jonathan, I tested it on a sandbox but it is not working for me. I think it's me I do something wrong. I added an owner, a library and a restriction to only owner and i can still see fund of the other library. I changed flags too but without results. See the video attached, maybe you will see what i do wrong Marjorie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #14 from Marjorie Barry-Vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #12)
(In reply to Marjorie Barry-Vila from comment #11)
I defined an owner for the fund but for me it is the same on acquisition home page, i can see funds of the other branches and of the other owners. I should see only the budgets that I am an owner, right? We need to change something in the drop down menu restrictions?
Could you confirm the issue still appears with these patches?
see the video here http://bit.ly/1mU7Hlt Marjorie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to Marjorie Barry-Vila from comment #13)
Hi Jonathan, I tested it on a sandbox but it is not working for me. I think it's me I do something wrong. I added an owner, a library and a restriction to only owner and i can still see fund of the other library. I changed flags too but without results.
The "test" patron has the manage_all_buggets permission. So he can edit all budgets, even if a restriction is set. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #16 from Marjorie Barry-Vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #15)
(In reply to Marjorie Barry-Vila from comment #13)
Hi Jonathan, I tested it on a sandbox but it is not working for me. I think it's me I do something wrong. I added an owner, a library and a restriction to only owner and i can still see fund of the other library. I changed flags too but without results.
The "test" patron has the manage_all_buggets permission. So he can edit all budgets, even if a restriction is set.
ok! it's works! Sorry for all my comments! I signed off. Marjorie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 sandboxes@biblibre.com <sandboxes@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Signoff |Signed Off CC| |sandboxes@biblibre.com --- Comment #17 from sandboxes@biblibre.com <sandboxes@biblibre.com> --- Patch tested with a sandbox, by marjorie barry-vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 sandboxes@biblibre.com <sandboxes@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #26757|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 sandboxes@biblibre.com <sandboxes@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #26758|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #18 from sandboxes@biblibre.com <sandboxes@biblibre.com> --- Created attachment 26897 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=26897&action=edit Bug 12019: FIX budget_owner_id node is duplicated The input witht the budget_owner_id id is duplicated. It breaks the jQuery selector $('#budget_owner_id').val(''); Signed-off-by: marjorie barry-vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #19 from sandboxes@biblibre.com <sandboxes@biblibre.com> --- Created attachment 26898 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=26898&action=edit Bug 12019: If a fund has a restriction, a owner is mandatory The C4::Budgets::CanUserUseBudget assumes that budget_owner_id is set if a restriction (budget_permission) exists. see && $budget->{budget_owner_id} && $budget->{budget_owner_id} != $borrower->{borrowernumber} Test plan: Edit a fund and try to save it with a limitation and no owner. It should not be possible. Signed-off-by: marjorie barry-vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Failed QA --- Comment #20 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- I think this works, but I am not sure that making the owner mandatory is the right fix. We have funds in Koha that have been created before the owner feature has been introduced and we can't expect libraries to add an owner to all those now to bring back a feature that worked in the past. Especially if the owner has no real meaning - it would just be added, to make the library restriction take effect again. I think we need to fix the visibility check to work without an owner. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> --- The "owner" field has been introduced in 3.01.00.077 and the restriction by owner already existed before bug 7304. Could you please detail what could be broken? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #22 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> --- Ok, maybe if a restriction exist on "Owner, users and library" and no owner is defined. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #23 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Hi Jonathan, the git bisect I did led me back to bug 7304 - so somehow the behaviour change was introduced at this point. I am not trying to be difficult here, but I think fixing the logic would really be better. If you select owners, users and library, and there are no users, it still works - why rely on an owner if the library is set? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #26898|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #24 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> --- Created attachment 27088 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=27088&action=edit Bug 12019: It should not be mandatory to define an owner if a fund is restricted Before this patch, the C4::Budgets::CanUserUseBudget assumed that budget_owner_id was set if a restriction (budget_permission) exists. see && $budget->{budget_owner_id} && $budget->{budget_owner_id} != $borrower->{borrowernumber} Actually a restriction could exists on users and/or library without being forced to defined an owner. Test plan: Create a fund A without restriction Create a fund B restricted to an owner Create a fund C restricted to a non defined owner Create a fund D restricted to owner and users (try defining/no defining an owner and/or users) Create a fund E restricted to owner, users and library (try defining/no defined an owner and/or users) With different logged in users, try to show/edit these differents funds. The restriction should be correctly applied. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Alessandra Carassiti <a.carassiti@cineca.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.carassiti@cineca.it -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #25 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Created attachment 27147 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=27147&action=edit [PASSED QA] Bug 12019: FIX budget_owner_id node is duplicated The input witht the budget_owner_id id is duplicated. It breaks the jQuery selector $('#budget_owner_id').val(''); Signed-off-by: marjorie barry-vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca> Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Signoff |Signed Off Patch complexity|--- |Small patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #26897|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #27088|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #27147|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #26 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Created attachment 27148 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=27148&action=edit [SIGNED OFF] Bug 12019: FIX budget_owner_id node is duplicated The input witht the budget_owner_id id is duplicated. It breaks the jQuery selector $('#budget_owner_id').val(''); Signed-off-by: marjorie barry-vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca> Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #27 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- Created attachment 27149 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=27149&action=edit [SIGNED OFF] Bug 12019: It should not be mandatory to define an owner if a fund is restricted Before this patch, the C4::Budgets::CanUserUseBudget assumed that budget_owner_id was set if a restriction (budget_permission) exists. see && $budget->{budget_owner_id} && $budget->{budget_owner_id} != $borrower->{borrowernumber} Actually a restriction could exists on users and/or library without being forced to define an owner. Test plan: Create a fund A without restriction Create a fund B restricted to an owner Create a fund C restricted to a non defined owner Create a fund D restricted to owner and users (try defining/no defining an owner and/or users) Create a fund E restricted to owner, users and library (try defining/no defined an owner and/or users) With different logged in users, try to show/edit these differents funds. The restriction should be correctly applied. Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de> Tested various permission combinatons, visibility of funds is now ok. - not superlibrarian, no buget_manage_all, no owner, no users, no library, no restrictions on the fund = visible - changed: library = staff patron library, restriction = Owner, users and library = visible - changed: library = not staff patron library = invisible - changed: budget_manage_all = visible - changed: owner = staff patron no budget_manage_all = visible - changed: no owner, user = staff patron = visible - changed: no user, owner = another user, restriction = owner = invisible - changed: budget_manage_all = visible - changed: no budget_manage_all but superlibrarian = visible ... Passes tests and QA script, also t/Budgets/* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|koha-bugs@lists.koha-commun |jonathan.druart@biblibre.co |ity.org |m -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #27148|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #27149|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #28 from Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> --- Created attachment 27282 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=27282&action=edit [PASSED QA] Bug 12019: FIX budget_owner_id node is duplicated The input witht the budget_owner_id id is duplicated. It breaks the jQuery selector $('#budget_owner_id').val(''); Signed-off-by: marjorie barry-vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca> Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de> Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Passed QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 --- Comment #29 from Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> --- Created attachment 27283 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=27283&action=edit [PASSED QA] Bug 12019: It should not be mandatory to define an owner if a fund is restricted Before this patch, the C4::Budgets::CanUserUseBudget assumed that budget_owner_id was set if a restriction (budget_permission) exists. see && $budget->{budget_owner_id} && $budget->{budget_owner_id} != $borrower->{borrowernumber} Actually a restriction could exists on users and/or library without being forced to define an owner. Test plan: Create a fund A without restriction Create a fund B restricted to an owner Create a fund C restricted to a non defined owner Create a fund D restricted to owner and users (try defining/no defining an owner and/or users) Create a fund E restricted to owner, users and library (try defining/no defined an owner and/or users) With different logged in users, try to show/edit these differents funds. The restriction should be correctly applied. Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de> Tested various permission combinatons, visibility of funds is now ok. - not superlibrarian, no buget_manage_all, no owner, no users, no library, no restrictions on the fund = visible - changed: library = staff patron library, restriction = Owner, users and library = visible - changed: library = not staff patron library = invisible - changed: budget_manage_all = visible - changed: owner = staff patron no budget_manage_all = visible - changed: no owner, user = staff patron = visible - changed: no user, owner = another user, restriction = owner = invisible - changed: budget_manage_all = visible - changed: no budget_manage_all but superlibrarian = visible ... Passes tests and QA script, also t/Budgets/* Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |rel_3_16_candidate -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12019 Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Passed QA |Pushed to Master CC| |gmcharlt@gmail.com --- Comment #30 from Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com> --- Pushed to master. Thanks, Jonathan! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org