https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17730 Bug ID: 17730 Summary: Uniform mapping for biblio.biblionumber (Unimarc) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: gmcharlt@gmail.com Reporter: dubyk@library.lviv.ua QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org Created attachment 57999 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=57999&action=edit Screenshot I try to deal with empty links to record details in the search. I found that this occurs when used mapping 090$9<>biblio.biblionumber (in uk-UA Unimarc tables) and typical use UNIMARCslim2intranetResults.xsl. In Koha mapping of biblio.biblionumber and MARC-fields mentioned in many files: etc / zebradb / marc_defs / unimarc / biblios / record.abs 25 melm 001 Local-number,Local-number:n 26 # Local-number (biblionumber can be either in 090$9 or, on some setup, on 001) 28 melm 090$9 Local-number,Local-number:n etc / zebradb / marc_defs / unimarc / biblios / biblio-koha-indexdefs.xml 9 <index_control_field tag="001"> 10 <target_index>Local-number:n</target_index> 11 </index_control_field> 20 <index_subfields tag="090" subfields="9"> 21 <target_index>Local-number:w</target_index> 22 <target_index>Local-number:n</target_index> 23 </index_subfields> etc / zebradb / marc_defs / unimarc / biblios / biblio-zebra-indexdefs.xsl 47 <xslo:template match="marc:controlfield[@tag='001']"> 48 <z:index name="Local-number:w"> 49 <xslo:value-of select="."/> 50 </z:index> 51 <z:index name="Local-number:n"> 52 <xslo:value-of select="."/> 53 </z:index> 54 </xslo:template> 63 <xslo:template mode="index_subfields" match="marc:datafield[@tag='090']"> 64 <xslo:for-each select="marc:subfield"> 65 <xslo:if test="contains('9', @code)"> 66 <z:index name="Local-number:w Local-number:n"> 67 <xslo:value-of select="."/> 68 </z:index> 69 </xslo:if> 70 </xslo:for-each> 71 </xslo:template> koha-tmpl / opac-tmpl / bootstrap / en / xslt / UNIMARCslim2OPACDetail.xsl 21 <xsl:variable name="biblionumber" select="marc:datafield[@tag=090]/marc:subfield[@code='a']"/> koha-tmpl / intranet-tmpl / prog / en / xslt / UNIMARCslim2intranetDetail.xsl 22 <xsl:variable name="biblionumber" select="marc:datafield[@tag=090]/marc:subfield[@code='a']"/> koha-tmpl / opac-tmpl / bootstrap / en / xslt / UNIMARCslim2OPACResults.xsl 25 <xsl:variable name="biblionumber" 26 select="marc:datafield[@tag=090]/marc:subfield[@code='a']"/> koha-tmpl / intranet-tmpl / prog / en / xslt / UNIMARCslim2intranetResults.xsl 25 <xsl:variable name="biblionumber" select="marc:controlfield[@tag=001]"/> t / db_dependent / Biblio.t 84 'biblio.biblionumber' => { tagfield => '999', tagsubfield => 'c' }, biblio.biblionumber in UNIMARC-tables: ru-RU 090^9 es-ES 001^@ en 001^@ fr-FR 001^@ pl-PL 999^9 it-IT 001^@ uk-UA 090^9 That is, in the context of biblio.biblionumber mentioned next subfields: 090^9 001^@ 999^9 090^a 999^c Probably for greater uniformity is better to use one subfield for biblio.biblionumber. Maybe 001^@? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.