[Bug 42023] New: Sort options missing when creating a list in the OPAC
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42023 Bug ID: 42023 Summary: Sort options missing when creating a list in the OPAC Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: 24.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Lists Assignee: koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org CC: dcook@prosentient.com.au, m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl When creating a new list in the OPAC, you are able to pick from a list of sort options that are pre-set when the list is opened. For a little while now we have the option to sort a list by multiple options, including publication date asc and desc. This list offers more options than what you can choose from when creating the list. Also the labelling is better including the information which direction it will be sorted on. It would be great if we could make both option lists match. To recreate: - Add a list to the OPAC - View the list of sorting options on the creation form - Save the list and add a few entries - Look at the list and look at the sorting pull down on top of the list - Confirm options don't match -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42023 David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CONFIRMED --- Comment #1 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- Finally taking a look at this... Looks like the "Sort this list by" options when creating a list in the OPAC nearly match those from the staff interface (OPAC uses "Year" whereas staff interface uses "Copyrightdate"). The "Sort this list by" options for the staff interface match the options in the datatable. Yeah... that's something... -- Currently: OPAC new list: - Title - Author - Year - Call number - Date added OPAC existing list: - Default sort - Author (A-Z) - Author (Z-A) - Title (A-Z) - Title (Z-A) - Call number (A-Z) - Call number (Z-A) - Copyright date (newest to oldest) - Copyright date (oldest to newest) - Date added (newest to oldest) - Date added (oldest to newest) Staff interface new list / existing list: - Title - Author - Copyrightdate - Call number - Date added -- So I guess the options are broadly the same except that the OPAC existing list has both ascending and descending options... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42023 --- Comment #2 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- The library asking for this was trying to use one of the missing options (not sure if asc or desc). So there is not technical reason we should not be able to make them match? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42023 --- Comment #3 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #2)
The library asking for this was trying to use one of the missing options (not sure if asc or desc). So there is not technical reason we should not be able to make them match?
We'll need to check the database schema, but overall there shouldn't be a technical reason not to do it. But I think it'd be an opportunity to harmonize all the interfaces and it'll just take someone a bit of work to do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org