https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8132 --- Comment #81 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> --- Hi Marcel, Thanks for taking a look at this. (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #79)

"If an item is the last one of a biblio that have biblio-level hold placed on it, we should block the deletion."

Well, this is quite arguable. Imo probably cleanup_database could remove holds that make no sense like biblio level holds when there are no items. The same commit says: "Note that there is something a bit weird as we are blocking items from a biblio that has biblio-level holds on it (not found), but we do not blocking the deletion of an item with a waiting item-level hold."

Lets not push inconsistency but resolve it?

What do you suggest? I'd like to repeat that this bug is about preventing phantom holds, nothing else. I don't think we should fix other inconsistencies on this bug report (it has been considered critical during years...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.