https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12722 --- Comment #13 from Heather <heather_hernandez@nps.gov> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #12)

We are not an OCLC library, but our workflow is tied to 001 being the ID from our union catlalog, so in a similar situation. At the moment it seems not easy to match well on 035 or at least more error prone with a lot of different prefixes?

In a MARC21 catalog, the 035 would contain a lot of different prefixes, c.f. examples at https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd035.html, e.g. these: 035 ##$a(CaOTULAS)41063988 035 ##$a(WaOLN)wln7986864 035 ##$a(DNLM)S30545600(s) The standard formatting of the required prefixes as stored in the 035 are formatted very differently from how the number would be formatted in the 001, so moving the data from an 001 into a correctly formatted 035 would be rather complicated. It's not something I'd want as default behavior in my Koha catalog at all, for either my authority or my bibliographic records. For authority records, we would always want to match on the 010 Library of Congress Control number, since that's stable no matter where the authority record comes from. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.