https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12722 --- Comment #8 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to David Gustafsson from comment #7)

Ok! Sorry, I was being very unclear, I was referring to biblios as well. I'm quite new to Koha and marc, so I might be completely wrong, but I don't understand why the handling of 001 and 035a should be handled differently between the two. When importing a bibliographic record into Koha I would expect 001 to be replaced with the Koha local id, and the previous 001 moved to 035a.

Yeah, we were talking authorities. On several reports there was indeed discussion about the biblionumber in 001. Until now no results yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.