[Bug 36848] New: Cannot make "Protected" field required via BorrowerMandatory syspref
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36848 Bug ID: 36848 Summary: Cannot make "Protected" field required via BorrowerMandatory syspref Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas@bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt@gmail.com, kyle.m.hall@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36848 David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcook@prosentient.com.au -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36848 Emmi Takkinen <emmi.takkinen@koha-suomi.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emmi.takkinen@koha-suomi.fi --- Comment #1 from Emmi Takkinen <emmi.takkinen@koha-suomi.fi> --- I was actually considering to fix this while working on bug 36825. But then I thought that isn't this unnecessary? Unlike input fields or sometimes select fields, "Protected" field always defaults to "No" since it's coded to be that way. So it's never "empty" and IMO there really is no need to make it mandatory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36848 --- Comment #2 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- Yeah that's a good point. If we had different mandatory profiles for different categories, then it would be useful, as you could force staff users to be protected for instance. But I can't think of a scenario in current Koha where this would actually work as intended. You'd just end up making everyone protected by accident... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org