https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25962 David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.koha-community | |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi | |?id=26055 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25962 Phil Ringnalda <phil@chetcolibrary.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phil@chetcolibrary.org --- Comment #3 from Phil Ringnalda <phil@chetcolibrary.org> --- On the other hand, in bug 32722 UNIMARC wants the exact opposite, to have the current behavior of the advanced editor be the behavior of the basic editor, because they have subfields that are mandatory if any other subfield of the tag is used, but having the tag is not mandatory. 100$a is actually a perfect example of the use-case for that: although MARC21 doesn't have the concept of required subfields, a personal name without a name is meaningless (and awkward to deal with if you autocreate an authority from it), while a bib record without a personal name as the main entry is very common, so it would be convenient to be able to require that $a be non-blank if 100 is used at all, but not require that it be used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.