https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13193 --- Comment #25 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #23)

I'm wondering if it's worthwhile effectively porting the test from Cache::Memcached::Fast::Safe for forking: https://metacpan.org/source/KAZEBURO/Cache-Memcached-Fast-Safe-0.06/t/ 02_fork.t.

It doesn't test our particular case, but, assuming it's right, should catch cases of missed calls to disconnect_all (which ::Safe does for us here).. in that way we should catch failures if someone down the line decides to remove the ::Safe module without fully understanding why we were using it.

Thoughts?

To be honest, that test looks pretty useless, as a barebones implementation using Cache::Memcached::Fast doesn't show any errors. use strict; use warnings; use Cache::Memcached::Fast; use Data::Dumper; my $cache = Cache::Memcached::Fast->new({ servers => ["localhost:11211"], }); my $version = $cache->server_versions; warn Dumper($version); my $pid = fork; if ( $pid == 0 ){ my $after_fork = $cache->server_versions; warn Dumper($after_fork) } waitpid($pid,0); -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.