[Bug 11177] New: Suppress No cover image available when there local image is available
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11177 Bug ID: 11177 Summary: Suppress No cover image available when there local image is available Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard@myacpl.org Reporter: imingchan@yahoo.com.au QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org Created attachment 22633 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=22633&action=edit Catalogue records for photographs "No cover image available" is showing directly underneath an uploaded local picture. Will be nice that this can be hidden. See screen image sample attached. Have tried to limit one uploaded local cover image to each catalogue, but this made no difference. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11177 Iming Chan <imingchan@yahoo.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Suppress No cover image |Suppress No cover image |available when there local |available when local image |image is available |is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11177 Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org> --- I assume from looking at the screenshot that you have another book cover image service enabled besides local covers: Amazon or Google? In my opinion that makes this bug a duplicate of Bug 7187, "Prioritize cover image sources such as Amazon, Google and add fail over i.e. if first source fails, go to next." If we can get such a system in place multiple services could be enabled simultaneously without the kind of redundancy your screenshot shows. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 7187 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org