https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26135 Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Staff interface |Acquisitions CC| |matt.blenkinsop@ptfs-europe | |.com Summary|MARCItemFieldsToOrder |MARCItemFieldsToOrder |should use "location" |should allow use of items |rather than "loc" |table field names --- Comment #1 from Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com> --- I'm renaming this bug and redirecting it a bit. All of the values one can map in MARCItemFieldsToOrder directly correspond to database fields, but a few of them use names that differ slightly from those fields. This has been an ongoing source of confusion. Can we make MARCItemFieldsToOrder work with *either* the current order object names *or* the database field names? The syspref wants: nonpublic_note, public_note, loc, and copyno The items table names those: itemnotes_nonpublic, itemnotes, location, and copynumber All other potential values listed in the syspref description match their corresponding database fields. Currently on main, either "loc" or "location" work when enter in MARCItemFieldsToOrder, but itemnotes, itemnotes_nonpublic, and copynumber do not work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.