http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1373 ------- Comment #5 from devin@freeshell.org 2007-10-07 03:28 ------- Thanks for working with me on this. First of all about the spec. It seems to say that caching is not expected but can occur and that's why the no-cache directive exists. For the pages you send that should never be cached, like in the cataloging interface and screens with a user login, if you are not explicit some user agents will cache it and be valid doing so. Personally I prefer this behavior since my 33.6kbps line seems much faster. Caching is per resource. Unless you serve your javascript, css and images inline or through the php page adding the caching directive, they will not be cached. In fact, you best explicitly tell them to be cached by adding reasonable expires headers. But that's tough to do as the developer since you php code is not involved in the serving of images. I think I experienced this with firefox on windows, or maybe opera. It was a long time ago. Anyway, it could happen anywhere that a proxy or client is configured for liberal caching. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.