https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18188 --- Comment #1 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- See also bug 18187. This field in items is labeled as Source of acquisition. Since it is a free text field, we can imagine that any information may be entered into this field. You could e.g. also enter a name of someone who donated a book. Unfortunately its literal name is booksellerid. Originally, it may have been the intention to really save the booksellerid; but making it an editable text field was a bad choice. Note: MARC21 maps 952$e to booksellerid, French UNIMARC maps 995a to it. Would you agree with renaming the field to acqsource? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18188 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de --- Comment #2 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- At the moment we use it in both ways in our library. Libraries not using the acquisitions module use it as a free text field adding the name of the vendor there. In libraries using the acquisitions module the booksellerid of the vendor is added by the acquisitions module. I am not sure what we will win by renaming it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18188 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Architecture, internals, |Database |and plumbing | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.