http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11130 --- Comment #1 from Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net> --- Created attachment 22356 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=22356&action=edit Bug 11130 Change pl Place-publication index for Marc21 According to ccl.properties, the pl Place-publication index is supposed to include 008/15-17 and 260$a. In record.abs, we have the index include all 260 fields. This patch removes the index for the whole field 260, leaving only $a (and 008/15-17). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11130 mathieu saby <mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.f | |r --- Comment #2 from mathieu saby <mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.fr> --- (In reply to Mirko Tietgen from comment #0)

According to ccl.properties, the pl Place-publication index is supposed to include 008/15-17 and 260$a. In record.abs, we have the index include all 260 fields. This patch removes the index for the whole field 260, leaving only $a (and 008/15-17).

Maybe it is in ccl.properties, but I believe it would be a bad idea to follow it on this point ;-) 008/15-17 is a coded information about a country 260$a is a plain text information about a town The 2 information should be in different indexes. In Unimarc, we use pl for 210 (the same as 260) and Country-publication for 102$a field (if I remember well) for the country. By the way, the "pl" index is completely useless for the average user in an academic or public library, at least according to my experience. Because I've never seen a reader looking for "a book published in London", or "All the books published in Paris". I think it's more a librarian-centered information. M. Saby -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11130 --- Comment #4 from mathieu saby <mathsabypro@gmail.com> --- By the way, record.abs is going to be deprecated in next version (or maybe later). So if you think that indexing is inconsistent you need to edit also the DOM configuration files. Mathieu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11130 David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcook@prosentient.com.au --- Comment #6 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- 008/15-17 is actually a bit more variable than "country". Sometimes, it's country but other times it's actually state/province (http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd008a.html). In any case, it's in a coded format, which is probably useless to all except the most hardcore human users. Good call on "pl Place-publication" being 260$a instead of the whole of 260. That said, you'll also want to include 264$a...but only when the 2nd indicator of 264 is set to 1 (http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd264.html). You have to love RDA... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11130 --- Comment #8 from Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net> --- (In reply to Joonas Kylmälä from comment #7)

(In reply to Mirko Tietgen from comment #5)

...

11130 follow-up: DOM indexing

Is there a follow-up coming or what do you mean by this?

It is already there. The patch includes the original one and the followup patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11130 Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|z.tajoli@cineca.it | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.