http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15554 Bug ID: 15554 Summary: Organize entries in ccl.properties Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Z39.50 / SRU / OpenSearch Servers Assignee: gmcharlt@gmail.com Reporter: dcook@prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl At the moment, ccl.properties is fairly disorganized. Once upon a time, it may have been organized numerically or alphabetically, but that seems to have gone out the window a bit. It would be nicer if it followed a similar scheme to https://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/defns/bib1.html That is, qualifiers and aliases would be grouped into Bib-1 attribute categories: 1. Use Attributes 2. Relation Attributes 3. Position Attributes 4. Structure Attributes 5. Truncation Attributes 6. Completeness Attributes -- Indexdata Extensions: 7. Sort 9. Ranking In other words, all entries that roughly follow the pattern "Qualifier 1=[A-Za-z0-9]+" would be grouped in "1. Use Attributes". Examples: Abstract 1=62 ab Abstract Any 1=1016 kw Any Likewise, entries following the pattern "Qualifier 2=[A-Za-z0-9]+" would be grouped in "2. Relation Attributes". Examples: lt 2=1 le 2=2 eq 2=3 ge 2=4 gt 2=5 ne 2=6 --- That said... maybe it makes sense to group together qualifiers that are functionally similar. Like everything found around the comment "# Koha Local-Use Authority Indexes" or "# Subdivisions". I'm not 100% sure how we should order qualifier (and alias) entries within their respective Bib-1 attribute categories. We could do it alphabetically or numerically (although some entries use index string names rather than numerical values. Example: Geographic-subdivision 1=Geographic-subdivision). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.