http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1504 ------- Comment #1 from jmf@liblime.com 2007-10-21 19:53 ------- This is much improved, saving most items field works now. There is still a problem with subfield 0 (zero). If you have subfield zero defined and mapped, it doesn't save properly. Also, although some of the fields at the item-level can be defined as repeatable, I'm not sure what the utility of these are, since they map to a single table, and so can't really be repeated. I'm also a bit skeptical as to whether the items table is being treated as authoritative for all edits/adds ... if the MARC changed, would what exists in items be preserved? If items changed, would it do the right thing and overwrite what is in the MARC? I will attempt to do some tests to find out. Just to clarify, the only reason the data is stored in the MARC in the first place is so we can search on it, the MARC isnt' intended to be an authoritative place to store items data. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.