[Bug 13148] New: Should we have core modules in PerlDependencies.pm ?
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13148 Bug ID: 13148 Summary: Should we have core modules in PerlDependencies.pm ? Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: gmcharlt@gmail.com Reporter: m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org If we still have perl 5.10 as minimum version, several modules in the list of dependencies are core modules (at least for some time). Like CGI, File::Temp, Test, etc. We should check them all. Would you agree that it is not necessary (any more) to list them, test their presence and so on? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13148 M. de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Should we have core modules |Should we have perl core |in PerlDependencies.pm ? |modules in | |PerlDependencies.pm ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13148 M. Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtompset@hotmail.com --- Comment #1 from M. Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com> --- Being overly explicit never hurt. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla-daemon@bugs.koha-community.org