Paul --

I think as long as the commit message identifies the target as 3.0-specific, there is not much benefit from a separate patches list for 3.0. I might defer to HDL on this, since he is the end recipient/manager of those patches, but I think the community of reviewers should be the same.

Since 3.0-specific traffic is likely to be small relative to HEAD's traffic, I don't think it is much of an imposition on the current list.

--Joe

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Paul POULAIN <paul.poulain@free.fr> wrote:

Hello,

atm, all patches are sent to patches@koha.org
They are supposed to be relevant for HEAD.
but : how will we deal with patches that are 3.0 only ?

For example : updates of the french translation. They are 3.0 specific,
and can't be merged in HEAD.
In a few weeks, I think we will have some bugs that are 3.0 only, and
irrelevant in head (due to some structure/code/features changes)

so, how will we deal with those ?
I once suggested to have a patches30@koha.org mailbox, this proposal has
not been accepted. But I come back with the general idea, as I think
it's something we will face quickly.
So, any idea welcomed...

--
Paul POULAIN
http://www.biblibre.com
Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc
NOUVEAU TELEPHONE : 04 91 81 35 08