Hi,
Just in case some of you have doubts about the interest of having
Plack
for staff interface, here is a result of
misc/load_testing/
benchmark_staff.pl made with and without Plack:
benchmarking WITH Plack:
Step 1: staff client main page 4178ms 4.786 pages/sec
Step 2: catalog detail page 9991ms 2.001 biblios/sec
Step 3: catalogue search 5631ms 3.551 biblios/sec
Step 5: patron detail page 7037ms 2.842 borrowers/sec
Step 5: patron search page 11800ms 3.389 borrowers/sec
Step 6a circulation (checkouts) 8967ms 2.23 checkouts/sec
Step 6b circulation (checkins)
13880ms 1.44 checkins/sec
all transactions at once 55433ms 3.247 operations/sec
(note = tests run with plackup, not with starman, the all transaction at
once results would probably be better with starman)
benchmarking WITHOUT Plack:
Step 1: staff client main page 28576ms 0.699 pages/sec
Step 2: catalog detail page 39106ms 0.511 biblios/sec
Step 3: catalogue search 55524ms 0.36 biblios/sec
Step 5: patron detail page 34610ms 0.577 borrowers/sec
Step 5: patron search page
64964ms 0.615 borrowers/sec
Step 6a circulation (checkouts) 37907ms 0.527 checkouts/sec
Step 6b circulation (checkins) 39129ms 0.511 checkins/sec
all transactions at once 138298ms 1.301 operations/sec
It appears that the speed improvement is more x3 or x4 than x1.5 as I
usually say
--
Paul POULAIN
http://www.biblibre.com
Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc
Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/