On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com> wrote:
Le 28/05/2012 17:46, Jared Camins-Esakov a écrit :
> Paul, et. al.,
>
> Sorry about the second e-mail ten seconds after the first.
>
> (I don't want to count bug 6858 in this list, because, for me, it has
> been tested by a dis-interested -well, in fact, calling the library
> "dis-interested" is maybe not the best term, but nevermind ;-) )
>
>
> I don't see how the library that commissioned the development could be
> disinterested.
me too, but the term "dis-interested" was used by chris_n, so I used it
too. But I agree everybody involved in a patch has an interest to see it
pushed ;-)
By "disinterested" I specifically mean one who has no pecunary (cash) interest in seeing the patch pushed. This exlcue both ends of the transaction: the party paying and the party being paid. All others would be truly disinterested parties.
> I don't want to break the rule. I just request that 3 identified ppl
> from BibLibre can sign-off in the name of the customer (I like the Proxy
> term).
> In case this wasn't clear, I have absolutely no objection to this,
> provided the customer sticks a note on the bug so the history is clear.
I think you missed something: don't expect a *french* librarian to
create an account on bugzilla that is in this strange language called
*english* !
Some of them will do, but that's only a small part.
Have them use *french* then... or whatever language they are comfortable in. There are enough resources to handle translation around here I think.
Does BZ have a multi-lingual interface?
Kind Regards,
Chris