Paul,<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">&gt; Agreed. At some point there may be no choice. I&#39;m pretty sure we have<br>

&gt; had a backlog in the Signed Off queue for a long time, possibly since<br>
&gt; always (Chris has a nice graph somewhere, but I don&#39;t know where).<br>
</div>Not since always, the &quot;need QA&quot; queue has been empty for weeks before my<br>
summer holiday.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Would that it were so now! </div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
&gt; In<br>
&gt; light of that, I think two months would be reasonable.<br>
</div>2 months ? That&#39;s really a long period, considering we&#39;ve a 6 months<br>
release cycle, with Feature &amp; String Freeze. That let only a short time<br>
for New Features and Enhancements<br>
I was thinking of 2 ... weeks. Let&#39;s cut the fruit in two (frenchism ?)<br>
and say one month ?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Fair enough. 1 month sounds reasonable to me. </div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Jared</div><div> <br></div></div>-- <br>Jared Camins-Esakov<div>Bibliographer, C &amp; P Bibliography Services, LLC</div>
<div>(phone) +1 (917) 727-3445</div><div>(e-mail) <a href="mailto:jcamins@cpbibliography.com" target="_blank">jcamins@cpbibliography.com</a></div><div>(web) <a href="http://www.cpbibliography.com/" target="_blank">http://www.cpbibliography.com/</a></div>
<br>
</div>