Recently, I used a discovery layer for a public library of which I’m a member, and I was so frustrated, as the search interface was so poorly designed. I spent minutes trying to find my resource but I couldn’t do anything but put keywords into a box, which did not retrieve the resource. Fortunately, I was able to fallback to their legacy catalogue where the search only took me 2 seconds to find the resource.

 

But it’s a reminder that the people who matter most are the users of the library system. If that library loses their legacy catalogue, I’ll probably just stop using that library, as the discovery layer search interface was useless.

 

David Cook

Systems Librarian

Prosentient Systems

72/330 Wattle St

Ultimo, NSW 2007

Australia

 

Office: 02 9212 0899

Direct: 02 8005 0595

 

From: David Cook [mailto:dcook@prosentient.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:30 PM
To: 'Paul Poulain' <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>; 'koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org' <koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org>
Subject: RE: [Koha-devel] roadmap to LRM support ? [was Re: What is biblioitemnumber for?]

 

I can’t speak to LRM at all, but it reminds me how perhaps we should start moving towards uncoupling some parts of Koha and thinking more about how the different aspects should/could interact with different metadata models.

 

I think Paul has already targeted the most important thing and that’s search. Users don’t care what metadata model is in Koha. They just want to be able to find the resources they desire. So whatever we do… I think we should put OPAC users of Koha first and then work backwards.

 

David Cook

Systems Librarian

Prosentient Systems

72/330 Wattle St

Ultimo, NSW 2007

Australia

 

Office: 02 9212 0899

Direct: 02 8005 0595

 

From: koha-devel-bounces@lists.koha-community.org [mailto:koha-devel-bounces@lists.koha-community.org] On Behalf Of Paul Poulain
Sent: Tuesday, 20 November 2018 11:58 PM
To: koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
Subject: [Koha-devel] roadmap to LRM support ? [was Re: What is biblioitemnumber for?]

 

Hello Stefano,

What you're pointing Stefano is very important: we must start our effort toward LRM.

Here is my 1st thoughts about it: I think that LRM support on Koha means 2 things:

Have I missed something ? What are your plan regarding IFLA-LRM ? What's next ?

Le 19/11/2018 à 16:58, Stefano Bargioni a écrit :

Paul, very interesting the basic historic idea. What you wrote, helps me to say that with Elasticsearch, Koha has the possibility to adopt definitely the LRM [1] model, that is going to be implemented in RDA [2].
Especially important IMHO are links among authorities. Or, better, links of any type.
Stefano 
 
[1] https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11412
[2] http://www.rda-rsc.org/ImplementationLRMinRDA
-- 
Paul Poulain, Associé-gérant / co-owner
BibLibre, Services en logiciels libres pour les bibliothèques
BibLibre, Open Source software and services for libraries