On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Galen Charlton
<gmcharlt@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
> 1/ Continue with the current workflow, patches signed off, passed qa,
> then into master, with the goal to increase the rate patches are
> signed off
+1
+1 as well.
> As Paul has noted in another thread, I am not comfortable with
> allowing patches into master untested, and I don't think I could do a
> good job as RM if that were to become the case. In that case I would
> rather become one of the developers submitting patches again, so
> perhaps 3 and 4 are the same for me.
This would be a huge step backwards.