El jue., 27 jul. 2017 a las 13:26, Eric Phetteplace (<ephetteplace@cca.edu>) escribió:
I can basically reiterate what Katrin said; we rely on this behavior and I wouldn't want it to change. Of course, implementing an opt-in syspref is a fine alternative. Depending on what's appropriate to your situation, it seems like you could just create a visible placeholder item as a workaround to get the bib to display.Best,ERIC PHETTEPLACE
Systems Librarian
libraries.cca.edu | vault.cca.edu | 510.594.3660
5212 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94618
1111 8th St., San Francisco, CA 94107
Preferred Pronoun(s): he/him
:(){ :|: & };:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com> wrote:El jue., 27 jul. 2017 a las 13:00, Katrin Fischer (<Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>) escribió:Hi Tomas,we rely heavily on the described behaviour to hide the record if all items are hidden. It seems logical to me - what will a user do with a record, that has no items? They can't place a hold, they don't know where to find it, which library owns copies etc. To me it seems more confusing then helpful.I think we shouldn't change the behaviour, especially because it has always worked like described and libraries might be unpleasantly surprised by a sudden change. Having the different behaviour as a configuration option would make sense.Yeap, I filed this bug to deal with this:Regards--Tomás Cohen Arazi_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
