> Would you be actively reviewing many or most patches that are
> submitted, and
> perhaps maintaining a QA Git tree? Or do you see your role more as
> organizing testing or advocating good software development practices?

Let's set the records straight. I wouldn't be a QA manager in the strict
sense of the term. I neither got the time nor the resources to be so. QA
manager on a project like Koha could be a full-time job. This is clearly
not my proposal which is modestly to give 1-2 hours a day to this
activity. So if QA manager role is to review patches before pushing
them, I'm not the right person. I see him as the person who put an eye
on the project as a whole, at a high level, from a technical and
community perspective, having in mind quality and open sharing between
participants.