Patch submitted ;-)
I have made this one dependant from 10869, because 10869 is a needed bugfix, that will maybe be applied to maintenance versions, while 10758 is an ENH, and maybe won't be applied to maintenance versions.

Mathieu

Le 20/09/2013 18:07, Mathieu Saby a écrit :
Thanks
I will try to work on that if I have time enough.

Mathieu

Le 20/09/2013 17:53, Galen Charlton a écrit :
Hi,

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Mathieu Saby <mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.fr> wrote:
As performance issue on search or circulation would be more harmful that performance issue on acquisition module, what about
- keeping the deleted* tables
- adding a new column "detetedbiblionumber" in aqorders
- editing some subs in C4 for taking into using deleted records as well as existing one
- (maybe doing the same work for deleteditems)

Works for me.

Regards,

Galen
--
Galen Charlton
Manager of Implementation
Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
direct: +1 770-709-5581
cell:   +1 404-984-4366
skype:  gmcharlt
Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & http://evergreen-ils.org


-- 
Mathieu Saby
Service d'Informatique Documentaire
Service Commun de Documentation
Université Rennes 2
Téléphone : 02 99 14 12 65
Courriel : mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.fr


_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/


-- 
Mathieu Saby
Service d'Informatique Documentaire
Service Commun de Documentation
Université Rennes 2
Téléphone : 02 99 14 12 65
Courriel : mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.fr