On 5/11/2011 1:38 PM, Nicole Engard wrote:

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> wrote:

Options as I see them
1/ Continue with the current workflow, patches signed off, passed qa,
then into master, with the goal to increase the rate patches are
signed off

This is my vote! I know it takes more work and more time for features
to be approved, but I'm for a more stable, tested Koha.

Nicole says it spot-on; the current process requires some more time, but it is *well* worth it, in terms of a running product, IMO. +1 for option 1.

I also strongly approve of Chris's leadership of this transition phase--you've done a great job, Chris. It's been an adjustment, for everyone, getting to the slightly-more-challenging process, but most folks I have talked to feel that it does make for a better product.

--
D Ruth Bavousett
Lead Migration Specialist
ByWater Solutions
Support and Consulting for Open Source Software
VISIT US AT ALA: BOOTH 732
Headquarters: Santa Barbara, CA
Office: Washington, DC
Phone/Fax (888)900-8944
http://bywatersolutions.com
ruth@bywatersolutions.com