Hi Manos,

it's an item field, so it's added for every item in 952/955.

As the complete items information is added on time of indexing, I think what Barton suggests is already the case?

Katrin

Surely, an item's checkout date and/or date due do not belong to the bibliographic marcxml field. What if we have more than one copies of a certain book for example?

MP

Στις Παρ, 18 Μαΐ 2018 στις 9:26 μμ ο χρήστης Barton Chittenden <barton@bywatersolutions.com> έγραψε:

One of my first trouble-shooting experiences with Koha involved a report of search results where an item was showing as 'available', but the detail showed it checked out to a patron. Some helpful bywaterian pointed me to items.onloan, and issues.date_due, and showed me that they didn't match. A database update and a zebra re-index later, and the problem was solved.

We've never figured out the circumstances under which these get out of sync... we always find out about it after the fact. I'm sure that we could find everywhere that they're written, and put the writes to the items table and the issues table into a single transaction... but wouldn't it be better to simply add the due date to the marcxml record from the issues table at the time of indexing and remove the possibility of error entirely?

It's a paper-cut of a problem, but it's always bothered me.

--Barton

_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/