On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Colin Campbell <colin.campbell@ptfs-europe.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:08:07PM +0100, Paul Poulain wrote:
>
> My proposal is that we should go the easiest way:
> * for now, the table should be called "aqinvoices", to be consistent
> with other acquisitions related tables.
> * in the medium/long term, get rid of any prefix, and rename "aq*"
> tables.

Why not just invoices, I think the prefixes are superfluous ( orders
invoices etc are relevant objects outside of acquisition, serials uses
them for instance and we dont need to distinguish them from some other
type of order )

I also agree with Colin. Lets go with invoices and work from there toward ridding the db of prefixed table names.

Kind Regards,
ChrisÂ