Zeno, et. al.,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Zeno Tajoli <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:tajoli@cilea.it">tajoli@cilea.it</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
oh, is quite simple.<br>
I want to export data in marc format to import in an other Koha and I<br>
use different frameworks to catalogue.<br>
<br>
If I insertr biblio.frameworkcode, I can re-import records in different<br>
frameworks.<br>
<br>
Clearly I need to setup &#39;marc to Koha links&#39; before to import with<br>
<a href="http://bulkmarcimport.pl" target="_blank">bulkmarcimport.pl</a><br>
<div class="im"><br>
&gt; For MARC21 frameworks, if we were add to this to the default framework,<br>
&gt; I&#39;d prefer that the 942 or the 999 be used, as those are already<br>
&gt; supported for bib-level mappings -- no need to carve out another tag.<br>
<br>
</div>Well, in theory 999 are repetable, 942 is not repetable.<br>
So for me is better 942.<br>
A new subfield or we re-use $a ?<br>
The subfield used are [default framework]:<br>
-- 942<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>What about 942$f? For &#39;F&#39;ramework?</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Jared </div></div><div><br></div>-- <br>Jared Camins-Esakov<div>Bibliographer, C &amp; P Bibliography Services, LLC</div>
<div>(phone) +1 (917) 727-3445</div><div>(e-mail) <a href="mailto:jcamins@cpbibliography.com" target="_blank">jcamins@cpbibliography.com</a></div><div>(web) <a href="http://www.cpbibliography.com/" target="_blank">http://www.cpbibliography.com/</a></div>
<br>