On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:00 AM, MJ Ray &lt;<a href="mailto:mjr@phonecoop.coop">mjr@phonecoop.coop</a>&gt; wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">&quot;Galen Charlton&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:galen.charlton@liblime.com">galen.charlton@liblime.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; While we work on bugfixing for 3.0, it is also time to give a concrete<br>
&gt; thought or two for the future. &nbsp;Today I will start sending LibLime&#39;s<br>
</div>&gt; RFCs for new features for 3.2. [...]<br>
<br>
Sorry to seem unappreciative of good drafting and some initiative, but<br>
can these please be revisited after 3.0 is out? &nbsp;At least at TTLLP,<br>
we&#39;re up to our $body_part in $animals_or_liquid still, for various<br>
reasons, mostly involving portability of some sort. :-(</blockquote><div><br>A necessary component of finishing 3.0 is formally deciding what features will NOT be a part of it, as documented by these RFC&#39;s.&nbsp; <br>These do not represent an assignment of priority.&nbsp; <br>
<br>--Joe Atzberger<br>Systems Administrator, LibLime<br></div></div>