El oct 1, 2012 9:40 p.m., "Mason James" <mtj@kohaaloha.com> escribió:
>
>
> On 2012-10-2, at 1:25 PM, Tomas Cohen Arazi wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:19 PM, MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Take a look at bug 8840. I think this script could be generalized to include
> >>> Debian. However, since the problem was Ubuntu, and not Debian, we didn't.
> >>
> >> It's OK but I agree it does seem to be rather Ubuntu-specific at the mo.
> >>
> >> By the way (looking at the other replies), I think it is apt-get that
> >> is breaking, as "sudo dselect install" and "sudo apt-get dselect-upgrade"
> >> are the same thing.  So if this multiarch bug isn't fixed in the OS,
> >> it may bite us later no matter what we do.
> >
> > You may take a look at this, they talk about wheeze and thus will bite us soon.
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664893
> >
>
>
> I'm curious, the bugs report says…
>
> "Well, your bug report shows there are still people using dselect..:-)
> It's of course not a big surprise that dselect doesn't support multi arch."
>
>
> so… whats the better alternative to dselect, that we should be using (that i know nothing about?)
>
> dpkg or aptitude, i guess??

dpkg is low level package management. apt-get is a convenient tool that solves dependencies and much more. aptitude is a gui front-end to apt-get, the same as dselect was/is.

aptitude wasnt multiarch ready a while ago, but didn't look at it again.

The missing dselect feature for this problem we reported is the --set-selections plus 'do it' sequence.

Regards
To+